REGISTRATION NOW OPEN: Feb 5th Pennsylvania Training on Producing World-Class Raw Milk

On Wednesday February 5th in Lancaster, PA, the Raw Milk Institute (RAWMI) will present a 3-hour seminar on Producing World-Class Raw Milk.

Whereas farmers producing milk for the pasteurized market often struggle to make ends meet, raw milk farms are thriving. Raw milk presents a unique opportunity for farmers to move into an expanding market by implementing intentional practices and higher standards to produce low-risk, delicious raw milk.

Raw milk is an exceptional farmstead product that brings all the added value back to the farmer with an incentive to work on quality. By selling directly to consumers, raw milk farmers are able to obtain greater financial rewards for their work, while consumers benefit from the improved flavor and nutrition. It’s a win-win for both farmers and consumers!

About the Training

This training workshop will be presented by the Raw Milk Institute (RAWMI) as part of the PASA Sustainable Agriculture Conference. This class will be from 9am-noon Eastern Time.

This RAWMI presentation will focus on:

• History of raw milk

• Why raw milk farms are thriving

• Health benefits of raw milk

• Benefits of selling raw milk

• Safety and risks of raw milk

• Grass-to-glass raw milk risk management

• Raw milk testing

• Building a successful raw milk market

Where to Register

Registration is now open through the PASA Sustainable Agriculture at: https://pasafarming.org/conference. Make sure to sign up for Wednesday attendance if you are going to attend our raw milk seminar.

Early Bird pricing is available through January 10th. PASA offers sliding scale pricing to attend the conference. If you will only be attending on Wednesday, the Early Bird cost is $70-$160 depending on your selected sliding scale level. Scholarships are also available through PASA.

Overcoming Hurdles for Raw Milk Legalization in Delaware

This article was written by Stephanie Knutsen, the dairy farmer who was instrumental in the successful legalization of raw milk in Delaware.

My journey to the legalization of raw milk in Delaware (DE) is quite unconventional, mainly because raw milk was not on my radar. Raw milk was illegal in DE and in the states around us, with the exception of Pennsylvania. I assumed it was going to remain so for quite some time. I certainly couldn’t make a difference, but wait… I did! Welcome to my story.

I didn’t seek out a legislator to champion the legalization of raw milk, but one found me! I received a phone call explaining that Senator Buckson was hearing from frustrated consumers about the lack of raw milk access in DE. He wanted to sponsor a consumer-driven bill to legalize raw milk sales, but wanted to tour a dairy farm and hear from DE dairy farmers before proceeding further. Little did I know that raw milk research and advocacy was about to take over my life.

We Drank Our Milk Raw, But Was it Safe to Sell to Others?

We have always consumed our own raw milk from G&S Dairy Farms without hesitation. I firmly believe people should have the right to weigh the risks and benefits to choose for themselves which foods to consume and therefore, I supported the idea of legalization. But, how did we feel about selling raw milk ourselves to the public?

I wondered:

• What is the real risk?  

• How many raw milk related illnesses are there?

• Would we be setting ourselves up to lose the farm in a lawsuit while trying to save it with raw milk sales?

• How could we live with ourselves if someone got really sick? 

These were questions I needed answers to.

Raw Milk Connections and Research

I remember sitting at the computer that night and typing “raw milk” into the Google search bar. By midnight I had landed myself on the Raw Milk Institute (RAWMI) website. The next day, I received the first of numerous personal phone calls from RAWMI Chairman Mark McAfee.  I was blown away with the knowledge, support, and guidance that Mark poured into me. RAWMI’s support proved instrumental in this legalization process. I was beginning to build my connections! These connections were a major key to our success story.

Many additional important connections came to me during my countless hours researching data, sifting through the bias on both ends of the spectrum, analyzing CDC datasets, and reaching out to experts across the country.  The more I studied, the more clearly I saw the raw deal that raw milk had been getting! For instance, I had heard that raw milk has "life threatening" risks yet in looking at the data, I could only find 2 confirmed deaths due to raw milk in nearly 20 years. This was despite the fact that millions of people regularly drink raw milk. The CDC estimates there are 3,000 deaths annually from food borne illnesses, yet they have only confirmed 2 deaths related to raw milk in ~20 years so the risks of raw milk were being greatly exaggerated.

With a newfound passion ignited, I no longer questioned if raw milk was a good idea for our farm. I could envision a future in dairy for our children for the first time! I committed myself to making sure that DE, which is referred to as “The First State,” was not going to be known as “The Last State” in regards to raw milk legalization.

Learning From a Failed Legalization Attempt

Once I empowered myself with the knowledge and facts, I needed to gather support. A failed attempt for legalization had been made ten years earlier. A friend, who also happened to be the Senate Policy Director, was able to access the recorded tapes from that failed legislation so we could understand who had opposed it and why.

Ten years ago, dairy farmers were worried someone would get sick and make the industry look bad. The Farm Bureau had been neutral about raw milk legalization, but both the Agriculture Department and Health Department were opposed. This understanding gave us a starting point for building support!

Building a Coalition of Stakeholders

Although there were 44 family dairies in DE during the previous attempt at legalization, there were now only 13 dairies remaining.  I reached out to these 13 family-run dairies in DE to share my research about safe production of raw milk. I also shared that the market for raw milk is growing and creates a path to sustainability for small-scale dairies. This resulted in an overwhelming amount of positive support for raw milk legalization by dairy farmers of Delaware. 

Next was the Farm Bureau, to see if they would potentially be willing to support raw milk legalization instead of keeping their previous “neutral” position. After meeting personally with the Farm Bureau administrator, we reached out to every county Farm Bureau and asked to speak at each of their board meetings. The timing was perfect since every Farm Bureau county hosts a legislative breakfast to inform legislators of upcoming bills and policies affecting farmers.

I presented on raw milk at each of these legislative breakfasts while the bill was still being drafted. The breakfasts allowed me to reach many legislators at once in a personal way. Much of our bi partisan support stemmed from these early face-to-face meetings where legislators could hear the whole story before they even knew about the coming bill. Soon we had every county board and then the state board of the Farm Bureau voting in support for raw milk legalization.

Building Bridges with the Opposition

We knew that the Agriculture Department and Health Department had previously opposed raw milk legalization. Instead of hiding what we were doing, we hoped to bring them along and give them the chance to learn more. This strategy proved successful over and over again.

With farmers and Farm Bureau on board, we were now well-positioned to meet with the Agriculture Department. Despite their longtime stance against raw milk, our Secretary of Agriculture was open to listening. I explained about consumer demand for raw milk, the economic impact to DE dairy farmers, the true risks of illness for carefully produced raw milk, and how we could further reduce health risks through regulations including bacterial testing with on-farm labs to ensure milk meets post-pasteurized standards for bacterial counts. By the end of the meeting, the Secretary of Agriculture was no longer opposed to raw milk legalization. We invited him to have input into the bill language and he eventually became our biggest and most powerful advocate!

We knew the Health Department was likely to be a tougher-sell on supporting raw milk due to entrenched beliefs about raw milk being dangerous. Senator Buckson called a meeting with the Health Department where he shared the “why” behind the legalization bill and mentioned that the bill might be passed due to bipartisan support. The Senator then invited the Health Department to provide input into the bill language to address their concerns. Although I would love to take credit for what happened in that room, all the credit goes to God. Miraculously, the Health Department agreed to be neutral on the bill!

Legalization Success

With farmers, Farm Bureau, and our state agencies on board or at least neutral, we introduced the bill with bi-partisan support in both the house and senate.  I could write a novel about every step of the way and the twists and turns we encountered, including the discovery of Bird Flu crossover to dairy!  Maybe I will someday, but that isn’t the purpose of this piece. We were successful and raw milk is now legal in Delaware!

Keys To Success

For those who want to advocate for legalization in other states or countries, I want to encourage you. Know that YOU can make a difference. Some of the keys to our success were the following.

• Raw milk is no longer just farmer-driven. It is consumer-driven by the countless people and families who deserve access to this special food.

• It was important to do the research and have fact sheets available with real data, including comparisons to other foods.

• It was crucial to reach out to stakeholders early on, especially to those who were opposed. It was scary and would have been easier to ignore the opposition and hope for the best, but with lots of prayer and bravery I sought after conversations with such people.

• An important approach that worked time and time again was to first just listen, show understanding for the concerns, find the common ground and move forward from there. By meeting people where they were, letting them feel validated and heard, and acknowledging that I too had felt that way, we were no longer enemies and we could have meaningful conversations where they were open to learning how my thoughts had changed.

• It was also important to build a strong team. Some of the key players on our team were the bill sponsor (Senator Buckson), his policy director, the agriculture advisor to the governor, Raw Milk Institute, Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund, Pete Kennedy (Weston A Price Foundation), and especially Peg Coleman (who provided scientific backing on risk assessment and valuable information related to the bird flu).

• I learned that emails proved to have very little impact and personal interaction was the winning ticket. My advice is to build as much support as possible early on, even before bill writing is complete.

• And lastly but most importantly pray! I saw God’s hand at work in this so many times and drew strength from that when I felt weary. He slayed some mighty giants for us along the way and I have to give him the praise and glory. Don’t be complacent. I knew very little about raw milk and look at what was accomplished. You can make a difference! If I could do it, you definitely can too!

Raw Milk, Asthma, and Lung Health

There are multiple peer-reviewed, scientific studies which correlate raw milk with improved lung health, both in childhood and adulthood.

Children Who Drink Raw Milk Have Less Asthma

Several large epidemiological studies of European children have found correlations between raw milk consumption and decreased rates of asthma.

PARSIFAL Study

The PARSIFAL study was designed to look at allergy risk factors in children. This large study of over 14,800 European children (from Austria, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland) investigated asthma and allergic diseases in relation to children’s exposure to different environments (farms, rural, suburban) and farm-fresh foods (such as raw dairy products, eggs, and vegetables). The PARSIFAL data relating to asthma and raw milk were published in December 2006 in the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Allergy [1].

The PARSIFAL study concluded that there is a "significant inverse association between farm [raw] milk consumption and childhood asthma." The study found that, regardless of which environment the children lived in, those children who drank raw milk had significantly lower rates of asthma than children who did not drink raw milk.

GABRIELA Study

The GABRIELA study was designed to investigate the genetic and environmental causes of asthma.  This study included over 8,000 European children (from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland), and was published in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology in August 2011 [2]. In this study, raw milk consumption was compared to consumption of boiled/pasteurized milk, and the level of exposure to raw milk in utero through school age was also accounted for. The study also looked into the children’s exposure to farm environments as a possible variable related to rates of asthma.

The GABRIELA study found that raw milk consumption is associated with significantly lower rates of asthma, and that this beneficial effect is independent of other farm exposures. It was found that early exposure to raw milk (at <1 year of age) and daily consumption of raw milk increased the beneficial effect in children who drank a mixture of raw milk and pasteurized milk. The consumption of only pasteurized milk “was not associated with any health outcome.”

PASTURE Study

The PASTURE study followed children from birth to age 6 years in order to gain a better understanding of the effects of raw milk consumption on asthma. This study of over 900 European children (from Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Finland, and France) was published in January 2016 in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [3].

The PASTURE study concluded that, "Continuous farm [raw] milk consumption in childhood protects against asthma at school age." This study found that raw milk’s “beneficial effect on asthma increases over time. Recent consumption of farm milk seems to be more relevant than consumption in the first years of life, which extends the concept of early prevention to sustained prevention until school age and beyond.” 

It’s Not the “Farm Effect,” It’s the Raw Milk!

Some of the research correlating decreased asthma with raw milk consumption has been criticized as actually demonstrating that living on a farm is associated with decreased rates of asthma. However, several of the studies specifically analyzed the effects of living environments, and found that the beneficial effects of raw milk on asthma were indeed present even in children who did not live on farms.

Furthermore, a meta-analysis of eight health studies related to raw milk was published in the November 2019 issue of the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [4]. A meta-analysis is a quantitative statistical analysis which combines the results of multiple scientific studies, thereby allowing the researchers to derive overall conclusions about that body of research. The recent meta-analysis, written by a team of researchers from the Netherlands and Germany, concluded that when taken as a whole, the body of data from the previous studies shows that raw milk consumption in childhood has a protective effect on asthma “independent of other farm exposures and that children not living on a farm can theoretically profit from this effect.” 

Adults Who Drank Raw Milk in Childhood Have Better Lung Function

Agricultural Lung Health Study

There is evidence that raw milk’s beneficial impacts on lung health are not isolated to childhood. Evidence that raw milk has a beneficial effect on adult lung health is seen in the Agricultural Lung Health Study, which is part of the larger Agricultural Health Study that was designed to investigate how agricultural, lifestyle and genetic factors affect the health of farmers.  The Agricultural Lung Health Study data relating to lung health and raw milk were published in March 2018 in the journal Thorax [5].

This study investigated lung function in over 3,000 USA older adults, with a mean age of 63 years.   It was found that "raw milk consumption, particularly early in life, is associated with better pulmonary [lung] function in adulthood." This study found that childhood raw milk consumption was correlated with “higher forced expiratory volume” and higher “forced vital capacity”, leading the researchers to conclude that “the beneficial effect of raw milk is predominantly on lung growth.”

Low-Risk Raw Milk as a Therapeutic Tool

It is clear from all of this research that raw milk consumption is correlated with improved lung health.  Children who drink raw milk have lower rates of asthma, and childhood raw milk consumption leads to improved lung health that lasts into older adulthood. There is a growing body of evidence that raw milk is a low-risk food when it is produced carefully and intentionally [6, 7]. Thus, low-risk raw milk can be a powerful therapeutic tool for improving lung health.

References

[1] Inverse association of farm milk consumption with asthma and allergy in rural and suburban populations across Europe. Clinical and Experimental Allergy. 2007; 37(5):661-70. Waser M, Michels KB, Bieli C, Flöistrup H, Pershagen G, von Mutius E, Ege M, Riedler J, Schram-Bijkerk D, Brunekreef B, van Hage M, Lauener R, Braun-Fahrländer C; PARSIFAL study team. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17456213

[2] The protective effect of farm milk consumption on childhood asthma and atopy: The GABRIELA study. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2011; 128 (4): 766-73. Loss G, Apprich S, Waser M, Kneifel W, Genuneit J, Büchele G, Weber J, Sozanska B, Danielewicz H, Horak E, Joost van Neerven RJ, Heederik D, Lorenzen PC, von Mutius E, Braun-Fahrländer C; GABRIELA study group. https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(11)01234-6/fulltext

[3] ω-3 fatty acids contribute to the asthma-protective effect of unprocessed cow's milk. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2016; 137 (6): 1699-1706. Brick T, Schober Y, Böcking C, Pekkanen J, Genuneit J, Loss G, Dalphin JC, Riedler J, Lauener R, Nockher WA, Renz H, Vaarala O, Braun-Fahrländer C, von Mutius E, Ege MJ, Pfefferle PI; PASTURE study group. https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(15)01731-5/fulltext

[4] The Beneficial Effect of Farm Milk Consumption on Asthma, Allergies, and Infections: From Meta-Analysis of Evidence to Clinical Trial. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practcice, 2019. 8 (3): 878-889. Brick T, Hettinga K, Kirchner B, Pfaffl MW, Ege MJ. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31770653

[5] Raw milk consumption and other early-life farm exposures and adult pulmonary function in the Agricultural Lung Health Study. Thorax, 2018; 73:279-282. Wyss AB, House JS, Hoppin JA, et al. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5758444/

[6] Recent Trends in Unpasteurized Fluid Milk Outbreaks, Legalization, and Consumption in the United States. PLOS Currents. 2018; 10. Whitehead J, Lake B. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6140832/#ref27

[7] Raw milk producers with high levels of hygiene and safety. Epidemiology and Infection, 2020; 148, e14, 1-7. Berge AC, Baars T. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32000877

SAVE THE DATE: Feb 5th Pennsylvania Training on Producing World-Class Raw Milk

On Wednesday February 5th in Lancaster, PA, the Raw Milk Institute (RAWMI) will present a 3-hour seminar on Producing World-Class Raw Milk.

Whereas farmers producing milk for the pasteurized market often struggle to make ends meet, raw milk farms are thriving. Raw milk presents a unique opportunity for farmers to move into an expanding market by implementing intentional practices and higher standards to produce low-risk, delicious raw milk.

Raw milk is an exceptional farmstead product that brings all the added value back to the farmer with an incentive to work on quality. By selling directly to consumers, raw milk farmers are able to obtain greater financial rewards for their work, while consumers benefit from the improved flavor and nutrition. It’s a win-win for both farmers and consumers!

About the Training

This training workshop will be presented by the Raw Milk Institute (RAWMI) as part of the PASA Sustainable Agriculture Conference. This class will be from 9am-noon Eastern Time.

This RAWMI presentation will focus on:

• History of raw milk

• Why raw milk farms are thriving

• Health benefits of raw milk

• Benefits of selling raw milk

• Safety and risks of raw milk

• Grass-to-glass raw milk risk management

• Raw milk testing

• Building a successful raw milk market

Save the Date

You can’t register for this workshop quite yet, but save the date and we hope to see you in Pennsylvania!

Build Immune System Strength With Whole Foods: Drink Raw Milk!

America invested $3 billion dollars and spent 13 years between 1990 and 2003 to figure out what makes us genetically human. The research project focused on discovery of the genes and genetic code that makes us what we are.  This work was funded by Congress and led by the Department of Energy and the National Institutes of Health. The findings were not quite as expected.  

Our parents gave us each about 20,000 genes that give us our basic structure and shape. That was the easy part.  That is our “hardware”. However, the “software” that runs our human machine gets a little tricky. It becomes very complicated and even inconvenient.

Rob Knight, founder of the Center for Microbiome Innovation and Professor of Pediatrics at the University of California San Diego, describes that,

“You’re more microbe than you are human.”

On a cellular level, we are only 43% human, with the balance of our cells being bacteria, viruses, and fungi. Genetically, our 20,000 human genes are vastly outnumbered by 2,000,000 to 20,000,000 microbial genes, which are mainly coming from bacteria. And most of these bacteria make their home in our gut.

At the cellular level, genetic information is shared between human cells and microbial cells. Genetic information is freely traded, exchanged and swapped around as an essential part of life and cellular function. The essential bacterial genetic information acts as “software” for the human cells, regulating the immune system, digestion, and manufacture of vital vitamins. This is how our human micro-biome functions.  

I like to say “we are Bacteriosapiens”.  What does this mean in real terms? How do we apply advanced science and use this information to better our lives? The bottom line is this:

We have great control over our optimal health.

We are not narrowly driven by the genes our parents passed to us. Those genes are important, but they are only a sliver of the genetics that truly drive our human machine. How we live our lives has tremendous impact on our microbiome and therefore our health. Were we breast fed, were we born by C-Section, did we receive heavy antibiotics early on? That’s just for starters. What we were fed as children and how do we continue to eat today? Don’t get into a guilt trip. That’s all old history. You can start fixing it today.

According to Dr. Anahid Jewett PhD at UCLA:

The healthy gut biome needs two things to reduce inflammation and keep you healthy:

• A load of biodiverse bacteria

• The whole foods that feed them

It comes down to nurturing our beneficial bacteria!  How do we get good bacteria to hang out, colonize our bodies, and become our very best genetic friends? How do we get and keep our genetic software so our human cells can make good decisions and keep us healthy?  Beneficial bacteria don’t hang around very long if we don’t offer them breakfast, lunch and dinner.

What nourishes our beneficial bacteria?  Whole foods do. What is a whole food? A whole food is a food that is unprocessed and complete. Nothing taken away and nothing added. Whole foods grow right out of good healthy soils which are teaming with earthworms, fungi, and bacteria. Whole foods come right out of the cow or straight from a well-nourished animal.

Americans don’t eat many whole foods. Instead we eat the Standard American Diet (SAD). In doing so, we starve and deprive our beneficial bacteria! In fact, we Americans love our antibiotics, pharmaceutical drugs, preservatives, sugar rich foods, long shelf life foods and GMOs. Highly processed foods and chemicals are destructive to our gut biome and the bacterial diversity required for genomic health. So what does that leave us? Its leaves us with “hardware and no software to drive it”. We become genetically inept at the cellular level.  We develop a whole range of diseases, including allergies, leaky gut, autoimmune disorders, depression, autism, and more. It’s really SAD.   

Nourishing and healing our gut microbiome requires moving away from processed foods and pharmaceuticals, and instead moving towards whole foods.

Raw milk, raw cheese, raw butter, raw cream and raw kefir are whole gut biome superfoods. They seed the gut with diverse beneficial bacteria, while providing the enzymes, proteins, minerals, and good fats that bacteria love to eat. They are whole foods with biologically active elements and protein systems that protect the gut, and build and maintain our immune system. They are the first foods of life!  Add fresh or fermented vegetables, grass-fed beef, chicken, eggs, and other direct-from-the-farm foods to make your bacteriosapien thrive!

Follow-on studies to the Human Genome Project continue today, including the Human Microbiome Project and the American Gut Project. It has become quite the clash of titans. The current medical and food processing establishments find this information to be extremely inconvenient. If bacteria are critical to life, then what are we doing with all the antibiotics? Sugars grow candida yeast and disrupt normal healthy bacterial colonization. Preservatives kill off bacteria in foods to extend shelf life and cause damage to the gut bacterial colonies. So does the widely-used glyphosate Round-up!

In the recent Coronavirus Pandemic, we witnessed lack of resilience in our gut biomes and immune systems.

While some people were not affected by Coronavirus others became deathly ill or worse.  We don’t know exactly why there was such a difference in these outcomes and pathways. We have been given a big hint, though: in general, COVID19 illness seriously affected those with compromised immune systems and poor health status.

New threats will continue to emerge. Viruses and bacteria continually evolve and adapt. Our immune system and gut biome must dynamically do the same. We must be adaptive and resilient to be able to address the ever present and evolving threats that will come to visit us. Will your immune system and genomics be up to the new threat?  Vaccines are always late, come after the fact, and don’t have the most effective track record. A healthy adaptive resilient immune system is with you and working all the time.

There is a long list of studies that confirm the health benefits of raw milk. These benefits include significantly fewer colds (which are viral illnesses), less asthma, fewer ear infections, reduction of eczema, less allergies, and stronger general health. These findings confirm that:

Those who eat a whole food diet and consume raw dairy products have more adaptive and resilient immune systems.

Get to know your bacterial self. You are not alone. Give your new best friends breakfast, lunch, and dinner. They won’t ever let you down if you feed them well.

Drink your raw milk and eat your whole foods! Cherish your new bacterial friends. They are the healthy you!

How to Find a Good Raw Milk Farmer

Is your raw milk farmer really producing low-risk, safe raw milk?

Numerous scientific studies have shown that raw milk is correlated with decreased rates of asthma, allergies, eczema, ear infections, fever, and respiratory infections. However, improperly-produced raw milk can be dangerous! For instance, studies have shown that there are disease-causing pathogens in up to 24% of samples taken from bulk tanks of milk intended for pasteurization.

So how do you find a good source for low-risk raw milk? Keep reading for info about:

• 35+ RAWMI Listed dairies across the USA and Canada

• Online raw milk directories

• Recommended checklist to assess your local raw milk dairy

RAWMI Listed Farmers

The Raw Milk Institute (RAWMI) has developed a rigorous program for raw milk farmers who are dedicated to producing clean, safe raw milk. RAWMI Listed farmers develop a plan for managing the health and hygiene of their farm, receive one-on-one mentoring and guidance for low-risk optimization, and test their milk regularly to ensure compliance with the RAWMI Common Standards for low-risk raw milk. RAWMI Listed farmers meet regularly as a community to share lessons learned and stay up-to-date on the best practices for low-risk raw milk production.

RAWMI currently has 35+ Listed farms in Arizona, Arkansas, British Columbia Canada, California, Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Ontario Canada, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, and Wisconsin. If you are lucky enough to live near a RAWMI Listed dairy, you’ve got a great source for low-risk raw milk nearby.

Raw Milk Directories

If you don’t live near a RAWMI Listed dairy, the following online directories might be helpful in finding a source for raw milk:

This site has a comprehensive state-by-state list of raw milk dairies in the USA.

This site has a handy interactive map of raw milk dairies across the USA and internationally.

For raw milk in the United Kingdom, this website has an interactive map of raw milk dairies.

Checklist for Assessing Raw Milk Dairies

Since most of these dairies have not been Listed by RAWMI, it is recommended that you do some research to make sure that the raw milk you buy is low-risk. Here is a short list of things to look for in a raw milk dairy:

• Make sure the cows/goats look like they're in good health, with regards to body conformation, udders, coat, etc.

• Check whether the cows/goats get sunshine and have access to outdoors and some grass.

• Inspect to make sure that everything involved in the milking process looks very clean, including the milking parlor, all milking equipment, bottle cleaning area, bottling area, milk jars/bottles, etc.

• Find out about their process for cleaning bottles, such as whether they use hot water, washing machine, etc.

• Ask to see what the udder cleaning process looks like, making sure the udders are cleaned very well, pre-dipped, dried, and stripped before milking begins. 

• Learn about their milk chilling process. It is best if the milk is chilled quickly to just above freezing (38-40 degrees F) in ~45-60 minutes, such as with an ice bath or other more high-tech chilling equipment.

• Find out what their water source is and whether their water is tested regularly.

• Find out what the shelf-life of their milk is, from fresh to souring. Cold, clean raw milk should have good flavor and taste for at least 12-14 days or even longer.  Short shelf life with rising bubbles in the milk would indicate high presence of coliform bacteria, which indicates that the milk is not hygienic.

• Ask about what regular testing they do, and find out specifically what their coliform counts have been. RAWMI Common Standards aim for <10 coliforms/mL of raw milk.

• Take a look into the farmer's kitchen: does it look clean and orderly? Look at their truck, too. Personal practices often say so much about behaviors when no one is watching. 

• To really make sure their overall processes and procedures are optimal for low-risk raw milk, direct them to contact RAWMI and consider becoming RAWMI Listed. 

If your local raw milk dairy is not Listed by RAWMI, consider asking them to contact the Raw Milk Institute. We provide mentoring and training, help farmers develop their own unique on-farm Risk Assessment and Management Plan, and provide ongoing support. It is FREE for farmers and helps ensure that their milk is low-risk and safe for you and your family!

You may also want to share these resources with your farmer:

• RAWMI’s 4.5-Hour Online Raw Milk Risk Management Course

• Essential Principles for Low-Risk Raw Milk Booklet - Available Spiral Bound or as a PDF Download

Two Types of Raw Milk

My family has been drinking raw milk for over 18 years. I drank raw milk through both of my pregnancies and raised both of my kids on raw milk since they were weaned from breastmilk as toddlers. I have purposely chosen raw milk for my family because of its exceptional health benefits and animal welfare.

Studies performed in Europe have shown that children who drink raw milk have decreased rates of asthma, allergies, eczema, ear infections, fever, and respiratory infections. Nonetheless, when I tell people that my family drinks raw milk, I often hear responses such as:

“Raw milk is dangerous!”

“Doesn’t raw milk make people sick?”

“I heard that raw milk was bad for you.”

The reason for raw milk’s negative reputation is that there are two types of raw milk!  Raw milk that is intended for pasteurization is quite different than raw milk produced for direct human consumption.

Raw Milk Intended for Pasteurization

When my family drives past a nearby dairy that produces milk for pasteurization, we are struck by the horrendous smell and filthy living conditions.  The animal yard is completely covered with manure. The cows have no choice but to lie and stand in manure all day. It is disgusting to think that this operation is producing food for families.

Raw milk that is “intended for pasteurization” is typically sourced from Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs). This type of milk is actually defined under the Federal Grade A Pasteurized Milk Ordinance (PMO).  Such milk is being produced in conditions where animal health is often compromised and mastitis (udder infection) is common.  Antibiotics are often utilized in these herds, and hormones are used to stimulate higher levels of milk production. The animals are housed in an abundance of manure, and there is a corresponding high rate of pathogens.

This milk is intended to be pasteurized to kill pathogenic bacteria, and as such, it is often produced with little care towards preventing contamination with pathogens. Furthermore, this type of milk is generally commingled with milk from multiple dairies, which increases the risk of pathogenic exposure. Studies have shown that up to 33% of this type of milk tests positive for pathogens. This type of raw milk is clearly unsafe to consume. I would never feed this type of raw milk to my family.

Raw Milk Intended for Direct Human Consumption

When my family visits the dairy that produces the raw milk that we drink, we see a very different setting from the CAFO dairy. The cows at the raw milk dairy are happily grazing on lush pastures. The cows look clean and healthy. The milk is bottled on-farm, and we can see that the milk bottling room is clean and neat. There is a stark contrast between the CAFO dairy and this raw milk dairy.

Raw milk that is carefully and intentionally produced for direct human consumption is wholly different from raw milk being produced for pasteurization. Raw milk farmers carefully manage the cleanliness and hygiene of the farm from grass-to-glass, with much care to ensure that the animals are healthy and the milk is clean.

From the health of the herd, to cleanliness of the milking parlor, to the specific cleaning processes for the milk line, to ensuring rapid milk chilling, to regularly testing their milk, and everything in between, raw milk farmers are dedicated to taking their farm management to the next level in order to ensure that their raw milk is safe to consume.

Although there are no federal standards for raw milk, the Raw Milk Institute has established Common Standards for raw milk that is intended for direct human consumption.  This type of raw milk is tested often and held to rigorous standards to ensure that it is being produced in a way that discourages pathogen growth.

Where Do Pathogens in Milk Originate?

The four main pathogens in milk that can cause human illness are E coli 0157:H7, listeria mono, salmonella, and campylobacter. The two most common sources of pathogens in milk are manure and mastitis. It is estimated that one-third of CAFO dairy cows have mastitis, and the cows in CAFOs stand and lie in manure all day. Clearly, this type of dairy environment is primed for pathogen growth.

On the other hand, the raw milk dairy environment is carefully managed to prevent pathogens in the milk. These farmers manage the health of their herd to prevent mastitis. They ensure that the milk from any animals that are showing signs of mastitis is not used for direct human consumption. Raw milk farmers meticulously clean the udders before milking to ensure that no manure or other contaminants are present. They also rigorously and frequently clean their milking machines, milk lines, and milk tanks.

Take a look at the milk filters shown below.  Even with just a quick look, it is apparent that the milk being produced with the intent to be pasteurized is clearly not clean, whereas the milk filter from the intentionally-produced raw milk looks impeccable. (To be fair, there are some dairy farmers who produce milk for pasteurization that is much more hygienic than most others. However, that milk is still commingled with milk from other dairies, many of which are likely to not use hygienic practices.)

Comparison of Bacterial Test Standards for Two Types of Raw Milk

Okay, I’m gonna get technical here.  If reading about standards and looking at charts is not your thing, you can skip ahead to the last section. :)

Two important types of bacterial testing for milk are Standard Plate Count (SPC) and coliform count. The SPC is a measure of the total number of aerobic bacteria in the milk. High SPC numbers can indicate dirty milking equipment, poor milk chilling, and/or poor udder preparation.

Coliform count measures the amount of coliform bacteria present in the milk. Coliform counts measure the overall hygiene and cleanliness of the milk. High coliform counts generally indicate the presence of manure or other environmental contaminants on the udders or milking equipment. High coliform counts are likely to correspond to the presence of pathogens in the milk.

According to the PMO, pre-pasteurized milk is allowed to have up to 100,000 colony-forming units (cfu) of bacteria per mL in SPC testing. The PMO does not have a standard for how many coliforms are allowed in pre-pasteurized milk, but the state of California allows coliforms up to 750 cfu/mL of milk.

In comparison, the Raw Milk Institute Common Standards call for <5,000 cfu/mL for SPC testing, and <10 cfu/mL in coliform testing. As you can see in the chart below, intentionally-produced raw milk is measurably quite different from pre-pasteurized raw milk, and even meets stricter standards than pasteurized milk.

The Raw Milk Institute has been collecting monthly Standard Plate Count and Coliform Count data from its LISTED raw milk dairies since 2012.  This dataset of thousands of test results shows that raw milk farmers who have been properly trained can routinely meet the stringent standards set forth in the Common Standards.

Research on Raw Milk Safety

Researchers from Canada and Europe have studied the safety of raw milk intended for direct human consumption. They have found that carefully produced raw milk is a low-risk food which is fundamentally different from pre-pasteurized milk. 

The table below contrasts pathogen test data from pre-pasteurized milk vs. raw milk intended for direct human consumption.  As illustrated in the table, pathogen testing of pre-pasteurized milk samples has detected pathogens in up to 33% of samples.  In contrast, there were zero pathogens detected in thousands of milk samples from raw milk intended for direct human consumption. It is clear from this test data that pre-pasteurized milk is categorically different from raw milk intended for direct human consumption.

Data courtesy of the British Columbia Herdshare Association

Not All Raw Milk Is Dangerous!

It is clear that raw milk produced with the intention to be pasteurized is likely to contain dangerous pathogens. This type of raw milk is unsafe, and I would never feed it to my family. Unfortunately, this type of raw milk’s negative reputation has led many to believe that all raw milk is unsafe to consume.

It is important to note that there is no such thing as a perfectly safe food. An analysis of foodborne illnesses from 2009-2015 showed that the top food categories commonly linked to illnesses were chicken, pork, and seeded vegetables. Pasteurized milk is not perfectly safe, either, and is implicated in foodborne illnesses and outbreaks every year.  The CDC outbreak and illness data which is used to assert that raw milk is unsafe does not distinguish raw milk intended for pasteurization from raw milk that is carefully produced and intended for direct human consumption.

It is clear from the above-presented test data that intentionally-produced raw milk is a low-risk food. In my family, we purposely choose raw milk for its superior nutrition and significant health benefits over pasteurized milk.  Raw milk contains greater bioavailable nutrients than pasteurized milk, as well as a wide array of beneficial enzymes and probiotics which are known to have benefits on the immune system and gastrointestinal tract.   

FREE Raw Milk TRAINING: RAWMI Risk Management Training Video Series

The Raw Milk Institute (RAWMI) has trained hundreds of farmers through in-person workshops around the USA and Canada.  For those who cannot attend our training in-person, we have a free web version for you!

RAWMI’s Risk Management Training Workshop is now available to watch on Vimeo here. This 4.5 hour course is broken into 17 segments for easier viewing. There are direct links to each of the 17 segments towards the bottom of this post.

About the Training

This RAWMI training focuses on:

• benefits of raw milk,

• grass-to-glass identification of risks,

• development of a risk management plan, and

• lessons learned from other raw milk dairies.

It includes lots of practical tips for the production of safe raw milk. This training has been shown to reduce outbreaks and illnesses, increase safety, and lower insurance costs.

Links to Specific Segments

The overall training course is 4&1/2 hours long, but we have broken that down into 17 smaller segments so that you can easily find the sections you want to watch.  

WORKSHOP OVERVIEW: 

PART 1 – Introductions and About Raw Milk Institute  

PART 2 – Raw Milk History and Opposition 

PART 3 – Raw Milk Benefits 

PART 4 – Raw Milk Risks and RAWMI Method 

PART 5 – Introduction to Grass-to-Glass Risk Management   

PART 6 – Small-Scale and Large-Scale Raw Milk Production 

PART 7 – Risk Minimization: Grass, Pasture, and Water 

PART 8 – Risk Minimization: Animal Health and Biosecurity 

PART 9 – Risk Minimization: Milking and Udder Prep 

PART 10 – Risk Minimization: Management 

PART 11 – Q&A for Parts 1-10 

PART 12 – Risk Minimization: Management (cont.) 

PART 13 – Risk Minimization: Management (cont.) 

PART 14 – Risk Minimization: Glass, Bottling, and Inspections 

PART 15 – Raw Milk Testing 

PART16 – Why to Become RAWMI LISTED 

PART 17 – Conclusion and Final Q&A

What Attendees Have Said

Here is some of the feedback we received from attendees at this training: 

“Excellent presentation that every single person who dairies for themselves and their family should take and learn from. Thank you very much.”

“This has been excellent!  ONLINE was so helpful as it’s hard to travel and be away.”

“For me, the combination of technical information and anecdotes is very effective for explaining why the RAWMI methods are important and how they solve a raw milk producer challenges. I came away with practical solutions to increase the quality/value of our milk and farm. Thank you." 

“I left the Zoom meeting with a very clear understanding of what we are doing right and where we need to make changes. Beyond that, though, I left inspired to pursue excellence and cast a clear vision to everyone who is joining me in this endeavor.”  

“The information was also rich and informative. I learned a ton and the systematic way you presented it was easy to follow and comprehensive.” 

“I cannot wait to move forward with you in becoming RAWMI Listed. We will be making some changes as we form our RAMP plan. We have already adjusted our milk chilling and have seen an improvement in flavor and longevity.”  

“Thank you for all you do. I have no doubt history will look back at the RAWMI as having played a crucial role in reforming raw milk production, health, and nutrition.”

DONATE to HELP Farmers Test Their Raw Milk

You can help farmers and families thrive by donating for milk testing equipment!

Ongoing bacterial testing is one of the pillars of low-risk raw milk production. With testing, farmers can easily detect small issues before they turn into big problems. However, testing costs can be an ongoing financial burden which makes small-scale farmers hesitant to test their milk often. The solution is on-farm labs, where farmers can perform their own bacterial tests for just $1-$3 per test.

On-farm labs don’t take up much space or need a lot of sophisticated equipment. With a simple incubator, set-up costs for on-farm labs are in the range of $800-$1,000. Because even those costs can be too much for small-scale farmers, at the Raw Milk Institute we devote $5000 of our budget yearly to providing grants for on-farm labs. We give 10 farmers $500 each to help cover the costs of setting up their on-farm labs.

As a 501c3 non-profit, we rely on donations and run on a low operating budget, but nonetheless we want to help as many farmers as possible have the capability to test their milk. However, with so much increased interest in raw milk, we have already given out all 10 of the lab grants we budgeted for in 2024! There are still many more farmers who want on-farm labs to help in producing low-risk raw milk, but we do not have the budget to continue giving out more lab grants this year.

This is where you come in. Your donations, no matter how small, can help more farmers build their on-farm labs so they can test their raw milk regularly. For every $500 we raise, we will be able to gift another farmer with a grant to make on-farm testing a reality.

Will you please donate today to help farmers purchase on-farm labs for testing their milk?

100% of your donation will go to helping farmers purchase testing equipment.

You can donate here: https://www.givesendgo.com/farmerlabs

USA-based donations are tax-deductible. With your support, we can continue to provide lab grants to raw milk farmers.

A Caution About Bleach and Chlorinated Sanitizers for Milking Equipment and Bottles

Sanitization can be an important part of an overall cleaning process for raw milk equipment, bulk tanks, and bottles. This is because bacteria growth can occur in milking equipment during the time between milkings.  These bacteria can contribute off flavors to the milk, shorten shelf-life, and in rare cases they can contribute to pathogenic illness when the raw milk is consumed.  The use of a sanitizer can help by reducing the bacteria load in milking equipment.  

Simple bucket milker systems and pipeline systems being used more than once per day may not need be sanitized prior to milking, and this can be confirmed with the use of bacterial tests. However, pipeline systems, and especially pipeline systems being used only once per day, may necessitate the use of a sanitizer rinse just prior to milking in order to lower the level of bacteria in these systems. Additionally, some states (such as Vermont) require that a sanitizer be used on milking equipment just before milking. 

Bleach and chlorine-based sanitizers are readily available and widely used for milking equipment.  However, when bleach or other chlorine-based sanitizers are used, special attention needs to be given to ensure that the amounts of sanitizer being used are carefully controlled.

Harmful By-Products from Chlorine Sanitizers

Although chlorine is quickly inactivated by contact with organic matter, chlorine is also known to create disinfection byproducts that can be toxic including trihalomethanes such as trichloromethane (i.e. chloroform). These toxic byproducts are formed when the acetoin, diacetyl, and other methyl ketones in milk react with chlorine [1].  

Trihalomethanes and chloroform have been shown to increase the risk of cancer, liver damage, fertility problems, and miscarriages [2]. Chloroform is categorized by the USA Environmental Protection Agency as a Probable Human Carcinogen.

Harmful Chlorine Byproducts in Milk

Studies, including those shown below, have shown that when chlorine-based sanitizers are used in greater-than recommended amounts, there can be unhealthy levels of sanitizer residues and toxic byproducts in the milk.  

• Volatile Organic Compounds in Foods: A Five Year Study [3] – In this study, the highest levels of chloroform in foods in the USA were found in dairy products.

• Chloroform in milk and dairy products B: Transfer of chloroform from cleaning and disinfection agents to dairy products via CIP [4] – This study found that the use of chlorine-based sanitizers in a Clean-In-Place (CIP) milking system can result in chloroform formation and contamination in the raw milk.  Chloroform was also found to concentrate in the milkfat, and therefore the levels of chloroform in cream, butter, and cheese were greater than the amounts in fluid milk.

• Evaluation of Trichloromethane formation in Cow’s milk from chlorine-based cleaning and disinfection agents [5] – This study found that “Increased chlorine concentration in the detergent and reduced rinse water volume resulted in increased TCM [trichloromethane] concentrations in milk, while the addition of chlorine to the rinse water also increased milk TCM.”

• Strategy for the reduction of Trichloromethane residue levels in farm bulk milk [6] – This study found that the ‘first milk’ that was collected in a milk pipeline system was likely to have higher concentrations of chloroform than milk which was collected subsequently.  Increasing the volume of rinse water in the pipeline resulted in a decrease in the amount of chloroform in the milk.  When chlorine-based sanitizers were used in recommended amounts, the total level of chloroform was found to be below the acceptable limit.

Acceptable Limit Standards

The USA Environmental Protection Agency sets an acceptable limit for chloroform and other trihalomethanes in drinking water at 0.06-0.08 mg/L [7]. The European Union (EU) sets the acceptable limit for chloroform and other trihalomethanes in drinking water at 0.1 mg ⁄kg [5]. Both of these standards are well below the concentration that would be considered carcinogenic.

The USA and EU have not published regulations on the acceptable limits for chloroform and other trihalomethanes in food.  However, in Germany 0.1 mg/kg has been set as the acceptable limit for chloroform and trihalomethanes in food, and target levels of <0.03mg/kg for butter and <0.002 mg ⁄kg for milk have been recommended [5].

Practical Advice for Raw Milk Farmers

We know that the use of no-rinse chlorine sanitizers in greater-than-recommended amounts can result in harmful levels of toxic byproducts (including chloroform) in the fluid milk.  

These issues would be lessened somewhat with the use of simple bucket milker systems as opposed to milk pipeline systems (wherein the milk flows over greater lengths of sanitized surfaces and cleaners can concentrate in low points in the pipeline system).

factors that make it more likely that sanitizers will be needed:

• More complex milking systems, such as pipeline systems,

• Milking only once a day instead of twice a day, and/or

• Hot or humid climates which can contribute to bacterial growth and prevent dairy equipment from drying properly between uses.

guidelines for using bleach or chlorinated dairy sanitizer as a no-rinse sanitizer:

• By federal regulations, bleach needs to be used at a concentration of no greater than 200 ppm, which could generally be achieved by using no more than 1 Tablespoon of bleach per gallon of water (assuming the bleach has a content of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite).

• Alternatively, chlorine test strips can be used to verify that the chlorine concentration is correct. 

• Be aware that some bleaches (such as Clorox Disinfecting Bleach) have a higher concentration of sodium hypochlorite and therefore need to be used in smaller amounts.

• When using chlorinated dairy sanitizer, make sure to carefully measure the amounts of sanitizer and water to ensure that the concentration of sanitizer is no greater than recommended.

alternatives to using chlorine-based sanitizers include the following:

• A pure water rinse can be performed after the use of chlorine-based sanitizers, just prior to milking or bottling.

• Hydrogen peroxide-based sanitizers can be used instead of chlorine-based sanitizers.  Hydrogen peroxide-based sanitizers do not create toxic byproducts.

• Acid-based sanitizers can be used instead of chlorine-based sanitizers. Beware that some acid sanitizers may not have a long enough time of action to be sufficient for milking systems that are only used once per day.

• Sanitizers may not be needed, depending on the complexity of the system, frequency of milking, and climate.  For instance, some farms using bucket milkers have had success in achieving low bacteria counts with the implementation of alkaline and acid cleaners without using a sanitizer. Testing for coliforms and Standard Plate Count can be used as a confirmation step to verify that the use of a sanitizer is not needed. Ideally, this testing should be performed throughout the year to ensure that a sanitizer is not needed regardless of weather factors (such as humidity and heat).

NOTE: Care must be taken with both chlorine-based and hydrogen peroxide-based sanitizers to ensure that they are never mixed with acid cleaners or vinegar.

References

1.       Coura, Fernanda & FERREIRA, F. & Barbieri, Jonata & PACIULLI, S.. (2020). QUEIJO MINAS ARTESANAL PRODUZIDO NA REGIÃO DE CANASTRA: CARACTERÍSTICAS DOS PARÂMETROS DE PRODUÇÃO, QUALIDADE DA ÁGUA E DOS QUEIJOS. Ars Veterinaria. 36. 78. 10.15361/2175-0106.2020v36n2p78-87. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342483080_QUEIJO_MINAS_ARTESANAL_PRODUZIDO_NA_REGIAO_DE_CANASTRA_CARACTERISTICAS_DOS_PARAMETROS_DE_PRODUCAO_QUALIDADE_DA_AGUA_E_DOS_QUEIJOS/citation/download

2.       Environmental Protection Agency (2000). Chloroform.  https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-09/documents/chloroform.pdf

3.       Fleming-Jones, Mary & Smith, Robert. (2004). Volatile Organic Compounds in Foods: A Five Year Study. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. 51. 8120-7. 10.1021/jf0303159. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8947382_Volatile_Organic_Compounds_in_Foods_A_Five_Year_Study/citation/download

4.       Resch, P. & Guthy, K.. (2000). Chloroform in milk and dairy products B: Transfer of chloroform from cleaning and disinfection agents to dairy products via CIP. Deutsche Lebensmittel-Rundschau. 96. 9-16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287869065_Chloroform_in_milk_and_dairy_products_B_Transfer_of_chloroform_from_cleaning_and_disinfection_agents_to_dairy_products_via_CIP

5.       Ryan, Siobhan & Gleeson, David & Jordan, Kieran & Furey, Ambrose & Brien, A. (2012). Evaluation of Trichloromethane formation in Cow’s milk from chlorine-based cleaning and disinfection agents. International Journal of Dairy Technology. 65. 498-502. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-0307.2012.00858.x

6.       Ryan, Siobhan & Gleeson, David & Jordan, Kieran & Furey, Ambrose & O'Sullivan, Kathleen & O'Brien, Rebecca. (2013). Strategy for the reduction of Trichloromethane residue levels in farm bulk milk. The Journal of dairy research. 80. 1-6. 10.1017/S0022029913000113. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235894115_Strategy_for_the_reduction_of_Trichloromethane_residue_levels_in_farm_bulk_milk/citation/download

7.       National Primary Drinking Water Regulations. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/ground-water-and-drinking-water/national-primary-drinking-water-regulations